Continental Drift in the Treatment of Dominant Firms: Article 102 TFEU in Contrast to § 2 Sherman Act

· 1 min read · Commentary Elsewhere

From Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog: Continental Drift in the Treatment of Dominant Firms: Article 102 TFEU in Contrast to § 2 Sherman Act

“Posted by D. Daniel Sokol Pierre Larouche, Tilburg Law and Economics Center (TILEC); College of Europe – Bruges; Tilburg University – Tilburg Law School; Center on Regulation in Europe (CERRE) and Maarten Pieter Schinkel, University of Amsterdam – Amsterdam Center…”

Tagged: Commentary Elsewhere

Cite this post

OSCOLA

Kevin Coates, 'Continental Drift in the Treatment of Dominant Firms: Article 102 TFEU in Contrast to § 2 Sherman Act' (21st Century Competition, 28 August 2013) <https://www.twentyfirstcenturycompetition.com/2013/08/continental-drift-in-the-treatment-of-dominant-firms-article-102-tfeu-in-contrast-to-%c2%a7-2-sherman-act/> accessed 8 April 2026.

Chicago

Kevin Coates. "Continental Drift in the Treatment of Dominant Firms: Article 102 TFEU in Contrast to § 2 Sherman Act." 21st Century Competition, 28 August 2013. https://www.twentyfirstcenturycompetition.com/2013/08/continental-drift-in-the-treatment-of-dominant-firms-article-102-tfeu-in-contrast-to-%c2%a7-2-sherman-act/.

BibTeX

@misc{kevin-coates2013, author = {Kevin Coates}, title = {{Continental Drift in the Treatment of Dominant Firms: Article 102 TFEU in Contrast to § 2 Sherman Act}}, year = {2013}, url = {https://www.twentyfirstcenturycompetition.com/2013/08/continental-drift-in-the-treatment-of-dominant-firms-article-102-tfeu-in-contrast-to-%c2%a7-2-sherman-act/}, note = {21st Century Competition} }
Download .bib file

Related Posts