Abuse of dominance: no commercial gain, no abuse?

Commentary Elsewhere: from writers around the web. Please note the explanation of this section on the “About the Site” page.
From Competition Bulletin: Abuse of dominance: no commercial gain, no abuse?


“Is it necessary for there to be some commercial benefit to be gained by a dominant undertaking from its conduct before that conduct can be condemned as abusive? No, says Mrs Justice Rose in Arriva the Shires Ltd v London Luton Airport Operations Ltd [2014] EWHC 64 (Ch). The case involved a claim by Arriva […]”

Cite this post

OSCOLA

Kevin Coates, 'Abuse of dominance: no commercial gain, no abuse?' (21st Century Competition, 11 February 2014) <https://www.twentyfirstcenturycompetition.com/2014/02/abuse-of-dominance-no-commercial-gain-no-abuse/> accessed 21 March 2026.

Chicago

Kevin Coates. "Abuse of dominance: no commercial gain, no abuse?." 21st Century Competition, 11 February 2014. https://www.twentyfirstcenturycompetition.com/2014/02/abuse-of-dominance-no-commercial-gain-no-abuse/.

BibTeX

@misc{kevin-coates2014, author = {Kevin Coates}, title = {{Abuse of dominance: no commercial gain, no abuse?}}, year = {2014}, url = {https://www.twentyfirstcenturycompetition.com/2014/02/abuse-of-dominance-no-commercial-gain-no-abuse/}, note = {21st Century Competition} }
Download .bib file