Judging Monopolistic Pricing: F/RAND and Antitrust Injury

Commentary Elsewhere: from writers around the web. Please note the explanation of this section on the “About the Site” page.
From Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog: Judging Monopolistic Pricing: F/RAND and Antitrust Injury


“Bill Page (Florida) has written on Judging Monopolistic Pricing: F/RAND and Antitrust Injury. ABSTRACT: In a 2013 opinion in Microsoft v. Motorola, Judge James Robart calculated “reasonable and nondiscriminatory” or RAND royalties that Motorola could lawfully charge Microsoft for licenses…”

Cite this post

OSCOLA

Kevin Coates, 'Judging Monopolistic Pricing: F/RAND and Antitrust Injury' (21st Century Competition, 13 December 2013) <https://www.twentyfirstcenturycompetition.com/2013/12/judging-monopolistic-pricing-frand-and-antitrust-injury/> accessed 22 March 2026.

Chicago

Kevin Coates. "Judging Monopolistic Pricing: F/RAND and Antitrust Injury." 21st Century Competition, 13 December 2013. https://www.twentyfirstcenturycompetition.com/2013/12/judging-monopolistic-pricing-frand-and-antitrust-injury/.

BibTeX

@misc{kevin-coates2013, author = {Kevin Coates}, title = {{Judging Monopolistic Pricing: F/RAND and Antitrust Injury}}, year = {2013}, url = {https://www.twentyfirstcenturycompetition.com/2013/12/judging-monopolistic-pricing-frand-and-antitrust-injury/}, note = {21st Century Competition} }
Download .bib file