by Kevin Coates | Apr 15, 2015 | Commentary Elsewhere
From Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog: TREATING RAND COMMITMENTS NEUTRALLY “Einer Elhauge (Harvard) suggests TREATING RAND COMMITMENTS NEUTRALLY. ABSTRACT: This article argues that the same legal standards should apply to RAND commitments whether they are...
by Kevin Coates | Apr 15, 2015 | Commentary Elsewhere
From Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog: Intel, Leveraging Rebates and the Goals of Article 102 TFEU “Nicolas Petit, University of Liege – School of Law describes Intel, Leveraging Rebates and the Goals of Article 102 TFEU. ABSTRACT: This paper...
by Kevin Coates | Apr 15, 2015 | Commentary Elsewhere
From Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog: The Meaning of FRAND, Part II: Injunctions “Greg Sidak (Criterion) discusses The Meaning of FRAND, Part II: Injunctions. ABSTRACT: Under what conditions may the holder of standard-essential patents (SEPs) seek to...
by Kevin Coates | Apr 15, 2015 | Commentary Elsewhere
From Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog: It Is All Predatory Pricing: Margin Squeeze Abuse and the Concept of Opportunity Costs in EU Competition Law “Daniel Petzold, Gleiss Lutz explains It Is All Predatory Pricing: Margin Squeeze Abuse and the Concept of...
by Kevin Coates | Apr 15, 2015 | Commentary Elsewhere
From Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog: Keep Calm—Yes; Carry on—No! A Response to Whish on Intel “Brian Sher, Nabarro LLP argues Keep Calm—Yes; Carry on—No! A Response to Whish on Intel. ABSTRACT: In November 2014 Professor Richard Whish published an...
